Koussai HOUSSINE, Laetitia NALY, Axel PETIT
Paris Diderot University, July 2017
Abstract
Technical communicators like to perceive themselves as go-betweens who use language to bring tech objects closer to the general public. Still, is technical communication (abbr. TC throughout the article) really a two-sided coin that bridges the gap between the humanities and science, the “two cultures” in Charles Percy Snow’s terms?
The aim of this paper is twofold: testing the assumption that makes technical communicators middlemen between the two cultures, and to do so, defining the features of the language of TC by general linguistic standards. A sharp analysis of the language of technical communication provides many interesting clues to define its identity.
First, a short history of technical communication since World War II helps us understand how the language of technical communication changed with economic, social and political contexts. Second, we sketch a definition of human language in order to set an accurate theoretical frame and to define the features of the language of technical communication. Third, the discussion of a series of tests completes the qualitative analyses of the first two parts. It provides evidence to support the conclusion of this paper.
Read the full article: Technical communication: a two-sided coin?
OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
comtechp7 (October 23, 2017). Technical communication: a two-sided coin? ComTech Paris Cité. Retrieved December 11, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.58079/n1z2